Details on the Public Transit Debate

Public transit supporters argue that the state will never fully get ahead of the congested roads curve.  Historically, they argue, as the road system is expanded and improved, relieving congestion and shortening commute times, more people choose to live further out, where homes are cheaper.  This brings a new increase in traffic, leading back to commuters sitting in traffic.  In contrast, they argue, investment in public transit could offer lasting relief for road congestion, lessen our impact on the environment, and provide a cost-effective alternative to endless road construction. 

Proponents argue that public transit is underfunded in Idaho.  Idaho is one of only four states in which public transit receives neither dedicated state funds, nor, given the lack of such authority, local option tax funds.   

Opponents argue that it’s no surprise that Idaho is one of only four states in this position, given our geography and population.  Opponents also point to low ridership on most light rail and bus systems.  If low ridership wasn’t a problem, they argue, public transit could fund itself through user fares, as it should, according to the cost responsibility principle.

Proponents respond that our system of transportation using cars and trucks on roads doesn’t pay for itself either and has been subsidized in a variety of ways over the years (including a 64% federal subsidy for Idaho roads currently, given our donee status).  Proponents also argue that while public transit may be inappropriate in much of Idaho, public transit can work, and is needed, in its growing urban areas.  At least in these areas, proponents argue, a public transit system of sufficient quality and extent can attract significant ridership.  With up front funding to get it going, they contend, such public transit systems can become more self-sustaining over time.   Even if opponents don’t want to provide dedicated state funding for public transit, proponents argue, voters in areas were public transit would be most viable, should at least be given the option to tax themselves for public transit, among other things, if they wish.