Adams, Canyon, Payette & Washington Counties
House B
CANDIDATES' THE COMMON INTEREST IN ACTION SCORE
The Common Interest in
Action Score reflects the percentage of Common Interest in Action
positions that a candidate supports. The Common Interest in Action
takes positions when there is a consensus of two-thirds or more on a given
proposal among the more than 100 members randomly assigned to review our
policy brief for that issue.The Past Score reflects issues on
which we took positions that have already been voted on by both the House
and the Senate. The Future Score reflects positions that we have
taken that have not yet come before both the House and the Senate for
votes. The Past Score for incumbents is based on their actual
votes. The Future Score for incumbents, as well as the Past
and Future Scores for challengers, are based on candidates' answers
to our questionnaire.
| Name |
Status |
Party |
The Common
Interest in Action Score - Past |
The Common
Interest in Action Score - Future |
Average Incumbent
Score: |
97% |
76% |
Average Challenger
Score: |
96% |
80% |
| Judy Boyle |
Challenger |
Republican |
|
|
| Jennifer Morgan |
Challenger |
Democrat |
|
|

Means that
the candidate did not respond to our questionnaire
Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Past
(Issues that have already been voted on by the full Legislature)
| Issue |
TCI in
Action |
Judy
Boyle
Position |
Jennifer
Morgan Position |
| % of the 100
+ randomly assigned members for or against |
|
| For |
Against |
Our
Position |
| Property Tax - Increased Homeowner's Exemption
'06 H 421a |
79% |
21% |
For |
|
|
| Property Tax - Increased Circuit Breaker '06 H
422a |
85% |
15% |
For |
|
|
| Property Tax - Closed the "Developer's Discount"
'06 H 676a |
97% |
3% |
For |
|
|
| Property Tax - Deferral for Circuit Breaker '06
H 680 |
70% |
30% |
For |
|
|
| Eminent Domain - Only Significantly Deteriorated
Properties Can be Condemned for Urban Renewal '06 H
555 |
67% |
33% |
For |
|
|
| Eminent Domain - Further Specification of Scope
of Taking Required '06 S1243a |
96% |
4% |
For |
|
|
| Eminent Domain - "Quick Take" Procedure
Available to All Property Owners and Govt Entities '06 S1247 |
76% |
24% |
For |
|
|
| Eminent Domain - Required the Govt to Pay at Least
as Much as Pre-litigation Appraisal '06 S1429 |
89% |
11% |
For |
|
|
Legislative Committees Can Only Close Meetings
for Certain Extraordinary Circumstances '06
HR 003
SR108 |
68% |
32% |
For |
|
|
| Election Reform - Required that calls placed by
an automatic dialing-announcing device (robocalls) must state at start
of call the name of person and for whom call is being made '07 H0223 |
93% |
7% |
For |
|
|
| Overcrowded Prisons - $15 million for statewide
substance abuse treatment services '08 H0695 |
87% |
13% |
For |
|
|
| Overcrowded Prisons - Required counties to provide
trained and certified probation officers for misdemeanor probationers
'08 H0408 |
88% |
12% |
For |
|
|
| The Common Interest in Action Score
- Past |
|
|
|
|
|
Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Future
(Issues that have not yet been voted on by the full Legislature)
| Issue |
TCI in
Action |
Judy
Boyle
Position |
Jennifer
Morgan Position |
| % of the 100 +
randomly assigned members for or against |
|
| For |
Against |
Our
Position |
| Election Reform - Fully Closed Primary in Which
Independents Could Not Vote |
7% |
93% |
Against |
|
|
| Election Reform - Party Option to have a State Run
and Financed Closed Primary '07 H0185 |
9% |
91% |
Against |
|
|
| Election Reform - Common Interest Modified Open
Primary (independents vote in primary of their choice) '08 S1506 |
79% |
21% |
For |
|
|
| Election Reform - Vote by Mail '07 H0094 |
86% |
14% |
For |
|
|
| Election Reform - Instant Runoff Voting |
80% |
20% |
For |
|
|
| Election Reform - Public Campaign Financing '08
S1292 |
80% |
20% |
For |
|
|
| Overcrowded Prisons - Raising Beer & Wine Tax
to Fund Substance Abuse Treatment '08 |
75% |
25% |
For |
|
|
| Overcrowded Prisons - Prevention, Treatment, Diversion,
and In-Prison Programs that are Proven to be Cost Effective at Reducing
Crime (CI percentages depend on particular program) |
69%-95% |
|