The Common Interest In Action - Home Page  
Senate
Ada County

Senate

CANDIDATES' THE COMMON INTEREST IN ACTION SCORE
The Common Interest in Action Score reflects the percentage of Common Interest in Action positions that a candidate supports. The Common Interest in Action takes positions when there is a consensus of two-thirds or more on a given proposal among the more than 100 members randomly assigned to review our policy brief for that issue.The Past Score reflects issues on which we took positions that have already been voted on by both the House and the Senate. The Future Score reflects positions that we have taken that have not yet come before both the House and the Senate for votes. The Past Score for incumbents is based on their actual votes. The Future Score for incumbents, as well as the Past and Future Scores for challengers, are based on candidates' answers to our questionnaire.
Name Status Party The Common Interest in Action Score - Past The Common Interest in Action Score - Future
Average Incumbent Score:
97% 76%
Average Challenger Score:
96% 80%
T. Allen Hoover Challenger Republican
100%
50%
Elliot Werk Incumbent Democrat
92%
88%
NO RESPONSE Means that the candidate did not respond to our questionnaire

Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Past (Issues that have already been voted on by the full Legislature)

Issue TCI in Action T. Allen Hoover
Position
Elliot Werk Position
% of the 100 + randomly assigned members for or against  
For Against Our Position
Property Tax - Increased Homeowner's Exemption '06 H 421a
79%
21%
For
For
For
Property Tax - Increased Circuit Breaker '06 H 422a
85%
15%
For
For
For
Property Tax - Closed the "Developer's Discount" '06 H 676a
97%
3%
For
For
For
Property Tax - Deferral for Circuit Breaker '06 H 680
70%
30%
For
For
For
Eminent Domain - Only Significantly Deteriorated Properties Can be Condemned for Urban Renewal '06 H 555
67%
33%
For
For
For
Eminent Domain - Further Specification of Scope of Taking Required '06 S1243a
96%
4%
For
For
For
Eminent Domain - "Quick Take" Procedure Available to All Property Owners and Govt Entities '06 S1247
76%
24%
For
For
For
Eminent Domain - Required the Govt to Pay at Least as Much as Pre-litigation Appraisal '06 S1429
89%
11%
For
For
For

Legislative Committees Can Only Close Meetings for Certain Extraordinary Circumstances '06 HR 003 SR108

68%
32%
For
For
Against
Election Reform - Required that calls placed by an automatic dialing-announcing device (robocalls) must state at start of call the name of person and for whom call is being made '07 H0223
93%
7%
For
For
For
Overcrowded Prisons - $15 million for statewide substance abuse treatment services '08 H0695
87%
13%
For
For
For
Overcrowded Prisons - Required counties to provide trained and certified probation officers for misdemeanor probationers '08 H0408
88%
12%
For
For
For
The Common Interest in Action Score - Past       100% 92%



Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Future
(Issues that have not yet been voted on by the full Legislature)

Issue TCI in Action T. Allen Hoover Position Elliot Werk Position
% of the 100 + randomly assigned members for or against  
For Against Our Position
Election Reform - Fully Closed Primary in Which Independents Could Not Vote
7%
93%
Against
For
Against
Election Reform - Party Option to have a State Run and Financed Closed Primary '07 H0185
9%
91%
Against
For
Against
Election Reform - Common Interest Modified Open Primary (independents vote in primary of their choice) '08 S1506
79%
21%
For
Against
Against
Election Reform - Vote by Mail '07 H0094
86%
14%
For
For
For
Election Reform - Instant Runoff Voting
80%
20%
For
Against
For
Election Reform - Public Campaign Financing '08 S1292
80%
20%
For
For
For
Overcrowded Prisons - Raising Beer & Wine Tax to Fund Substance Abuse Treatment '08
75%
25%
For
For
For
Overcrowded Prisons - Prevention, Treatment, Diversion, and In-Prison Programs that are Proven to be Cost Effective at Reducing Crime (CI percentages depend on particular program)
69%-95%
31%-5%
For
For
For
The Common Interest in Action Score - Future    
50% 88%

 

T. Allen Hoover
Race: Senate
The Common Interest in Action Score
Candidate

Challenger Average

Past
100%
96%
Future
50%
80%
Party: Republican
Status: Challenger
Contact: Email: tallenhoover@aol.com
Office phone: 208-376-9595
Web site: www.tallenhoover.com
 
Comment by Keith Allred about Candidate:
   
Statement by Candidate about Why Running:
   
Candidate Statement about The Common Interest:
   
Candidate Bio:
  See Web site
Candidate Statement on Partisan Politics and Special Interests:
   

 

Elliot Werk
Race: Senate
The Common Interest in Action Score
Candidate

Incumbent Average

Past
92%
97%
Future
88%
76%
Party: Democrat
Status: Incumbent
Contact: Email: elliotwerk@mindspring
Office phone: (208) 658-0388
Web site: www.elliotwerk.org
 
Comment by Keith Allred about Candidate:
  Senator Werk has been very interested in our views and expressed appreciation and support for our work. We are working with him particularly closely on our efforts to raise to the beer and wine tax to provide dedicated funding for substance abuse treatment as a cost effective way to avoid having to build $1 billion in new prisons over the next 10 years. With 85% of Idaho inmates having drug abuse problems that make them likely to commit crimes again when they’re released, Senator Werk strongly agrees with us that substance abuse treatment is central to addressing this problem. As an important member of the Joint Finance and Appropriations Committee he well understands the budget busting implications of not getting better handle on the overcrowded prisons problem.
Statement by Candidate about Why Running:
  I am running to provide a strong voice for change in the legislature for District 17. I will continue to protect our quality of life while pushing for exceptional public education, affordable healthcare, a strong economy, high wage jobs, public transit, 21st century energy policies, and ethics reform in government. The people of District 17 need a strong voice in the legislature that stands up to special interests and speaks up for the middle class. That is why I am running.

Some of the issues I care about include enhancing our education system (k-university) by providing better support for educators and adequate resources, shifting the focus of our criminal justice system from punishment to treatment, empowering local communities to develop road and public transit options, enhancing the quality of life in the Treasure Valley (by supporting air quality, public transit funding, and smarter growth), providing statewide safety standards and criminal background checks for child day care providers, working for voluntary early childhood education, and working for family values that value families like access to affordable, quality health care and pharmaceuticals, a world-class public education system, livable wages, worker protection, community-based substance abuse and mental health treatment (rather than costlier incarceration), clean, sustainable power, a healthy environment, access to public lands, and policies that improve our everyday quality of life and empower local communities.

Candidate Statement about The Common Interest:
  As a respected and non-partisan organization, the Common Interest is ideally positioned to advocate for common-sense solutions to the issues that we face. The Common Interest can be influential not only in providing potential solutions to issues but more importantly to making sure that critical issues are placed on the legislative agenda. Because of the dominance of one party it is common for a very limited number of potential solutions to be debated by the Legislature. It is vitally important that a broad range of potential solutions are evaluated by the legislature to ensure that the best possible public policy is enacted. The Common Interest can assist the legislature in vetting the full range of ideas and possibilities, and providing information and assistance.

My role as a State Senator is to interact with the Common Interest to help advance the discussion of issues that are of vital importance. The issue of increasing beer and wine taxes to provide resources for substance abuse treatment is a very good example.

I appreciate the thoughtful counsel of the Common Interest and look forward to working with you in the future.

Candidate Bio:
  Senator Elliot Werk was born in Montreal, Canada, immigrated to the United States when he was seven and became a citizen in 1979. He attended Sonoma State University where he graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Science degree in geology and worked as an engineering geologist and geothermal exploration geologist. In 1986 he began a career working as an environmental consultant restoring contaminated properties for companies like General Dynamics and Shell Oil Company and providing due diligence services to large real estate investment trust companies.

He is married to Nancy Greenwald (a local physician) and has one daughter (Hattie) that attends a public high school in Boise.

Senator Werk is deeply involved in his community through the Borah Neighborhood Association where he serves as president.

In the Idaho legislature Senator Werk currently serves on the Joint Finance Appropriations, Commerce and Human Resources, Health and Welfare, Joint Legislative Oversight, and Millennium Fund committees as well as the Property Tax and Energy, Environment, and Technology interim committees.

Senator Werk has focused on legislation associated with energy and energy efficiency, child day care standards, consumer protection, eliminating the tax on food, mental health and substance abuse, ethics and transparency in government, and the impacts of climate change on Idaho’s economy.

Candidate Statement on Partisan Politics and Special Interests:
 

I’m afraid that my thoughts on this subject are mostly negative.

Partisan political (and internecine war between factions of the Republican Party) and special interests have a mostly negative influence on public policy. In many instances the overwhelming dominance of one party in Idaho results in a narrowing of the legislative agenda and an even narrower list of potential solutions that are debated. Partisan politics can scuttle promising legislative initiatives. The influence of special interests in a one party dominated legislature also severely narrows the agenda and results in public policy that is often skewed to benefit a very narrow group at the expense of the majority of individuals in the state.

My job as a legislator is to bridge the gap between parties and ensure an open exchange of ideas. This allows legislators to evaluate issues more fully and to evolve to more moderate and beneficial positions. Partisan politics and the influence of special interests can be overcome.


 
   
 
   

 

Your Solution.Net