 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Ada County
Senate
CANDIDATES' THE COMMON INTEREST IN ACTION SCORE
The Common Interest in
Action Score reflects the percentage of Common Interest in Action
positions that a candidate supports. The Common Interest in Action
takes positions when there is a consensus of two-thirds or more on a given
proposal among the more than 100 members randomly assigned to review our
policy brief for that issue.The Past Score reflects issues on
which we took positions that have already been voted on by both the House
and the Senate. The Future Score reflects positions that we have
taken that have not yet come before both the House and the Senate for
votes. The Past Score for incumbents is based on their actual
votes. The Future Score for incumbents, as well as the Past
and Future Scores for challengers, are based on candidates' answers
to our questionnaire.
| Name |
Status |
Party |
The Common
Interest in Action Score - Past |
The Common
Interest in Action Score - Future |
Average Incumbent
Score: |
97% |
76% |
Average Challenger
Score: |
96% |
80% |
| T. Allen Hoover |
Challenger |
Republican |
100% |
50% |
| Elliot Werk |
Incumbent |
Democrat |
92% |
88% |
 Means that
the candidate did not respond to our questionnaire
Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Past
(Issues that have already been voted on by the full Legislature)
| Issue |
TCI in
Action |
T.
Allen Hoover
Position |
Elliot
Werk Position |
| % of the 100
+ randomly assigned members for or against |
|
| For |
Against |
Our
Position |
| Property Tax - Increased Homeowner's Exemption
'06 H 421a |
79% |
21% |
For |
For |
For |
| Property Tax - Increased Circuit Breaker '06 H
422a |
85% |
15% |
For |
For |
For |
| Property Tax - Closed the "Developer's Discount"
'06 H 676a |
97% |
3% |
For |
For |
For |
| Property Tax - Deferral for Circuit Breaker '06
H 680 |
70% |
30% |
For |
For |
For |
| Eminent Domain - Only Significantly Deteriorated
Properties Can be Condemned for Urban Renewal '06 H
555 |
67% |
33% |
For |
For |
For |
| Eminent Domain - Further Specification of Scope
of Taking Required '06 S1243a |
96% |
4% |
For |
For |
For |
| Eminent Domain - "Quick Take" Procedure
Available to All Property Owners and Govt Entities '06 S1247 |
76% |
24% |
For |
For |
For |
| Eminent Domain - Required the Govt to Pay at Least
as Much as Pre-litigation Appraisal '06 S1429 |
89% |
11% |
For |
For |
For |
Legislative Committees Can Only Close Meetings
for Certain Extraordinary Circumstances '06
HR 003
SR108 |
68% |
32% |
For |
For |
Against |
| Election Reform - Required that calls placed by
an automatic dialing-announcing device (robocalls) must state at start
of call the name of person and for whom call is being made '07 H0223 |
93% |
7% |
For |
For |
For |
| Overcrowded Prisons - $15 million for statewide
substance abuse treatment services '08 H0695 |
87% |
13% |
For |
For |
For |
| Overcrowded Prisons - Required counties to provide
trained and certified probation officers for misdemeanor probationers
'08 H0408 |
88% |
12% |
For |
For |
For |
| The Common Interest in Action Score
- Past |
|
|
|
100% |
92% |
Details for The Common Interest in Action Score - Future
(Issues that have not yet been voted on by the full Legislature)
| Issue |
TCI in
Action |
T.
Allen Hoover Position |
Elliot
Werk Position |
| % of the 100 +
randomly assigned members for or against |
|
| For |
Against |
Our
Position |
| Election Reform - Fully Closed Primary in Which
Independents Could Not Vote |
7% |
93% |
Against |
For |
Against |
| Election Reform - Party Option to have a State Run
and Financed Closed Primary '07 H0185 |
9% |
91% |
Against |
For |
Against |
| Election Reform - Common Interest Modified Open
Primary (independents vote in primary of their choice) '08 S1506 |
79% |
21% |
For |
Against |
Against |
| Election Reform - Vote by Mail '07 H0094 |
86% |
14% |
For |
For |
For |
| Election Reform - Instant Runoff Voting |
80% |
20% |
For |
Against |
For |
| Election Reform - Public Campaign Financing '08
S1292 |
80% |
20% |
For |
For |
For |
| Overcrowded Prisons - Raising Beer & Wine Tax
to Fund Substance Abuse Treatment '08 |
75% |
25% |
For |
For |
For |
| Overcrowded Prisons - Prevention, Treatment, Diversion,
and In-Prison Programs that are Proven to be Cost Effective at Reducing
Crime (CI percentages depend on particular program) |
69%-95% |
31%-5% |
For |
For |
For |
| The Common Interest in Action Score
- Future |
|
|
|
50% |
88% |
|
|
| Race: |
Senate |
The
Common Interest in Action Score |
|
Candidate |
|
| Past |
100% |
96% |
| Future |
50% |
80% |
|
| Party: |
Republican |
| Status: |
Challenger |
| Contact: |
Email: tallenhoover@aol.com
Office phone: 208-376-9595 |
| Web site: |
www.tallenhoover.com |
| |
| Comment by Keith Allred about Candidate: |
| |
|
| Statement by Candidate about Why Running: |
| |
|
| Candidate Statement about The Common Interest: |
| |
|
| Candidate Bio: |
| |
See Web site |
| Candidate Statement on Partisan Politics and
Special Interests: |
| |
|
|
|
| Race: |
Senate |
The
Common Interest in Action Score |
|
Candidate |
|
| Past |
92% |
97% |
| Future |
88% |
76% |
|
| Party: |
Democrat |
| Status: | Incumbent |
| Contact: |
Email: elliotwerk@mindspring
Office phone: (208) 658-0388 |
| Web site: |
www.elliotwerk.org |
| |
| Comment by Keith Allred about Candidate: |
| |
Senator Werk has been very interested in our views and expressed
appreciation and support for our work. We are working with him
particularly closely on our efforts to raise to the beer and wine
tax to provide dedicated funding for substance abuse treatment
as a cost effective way to avoid having to build $1 billion in
new prisons over the next 10 years. With 85% of Idaho inmates
having drug abuse problems that make them likely to commit crimes
again when they’re released, Senator Werk strongly agrees with
us that substance abuse treatment is central to addressing this
problem. As an important member of the Joint Finance and Appropriations
Committee he well understands the budget busting implications
of not getting better handle on the overcrowded prisons problem. |
| Statement by Candidate about
Why Running: |
| |
I am running to provide a strong voice for change
in the legislature for District 17. I will continue to protect
our quality of life while pushing for exceptional public education,
affordable healthcare, a strong economy, high wage jobs, public
transit, 21st century energy policies, and ethics reform in government.
The people of District 17 need a strong voice in the legislature
that stands up to special interests and speaks up for the middle
class. That is why I am running.
Some of the issues I care about include enhancing our education
system (k-university) by providing better support for educators
and adequate resources, shifting the focus of our criminal justice
system from punishment to treatment, empowering local communities
to develop road and public transit options, enhancing the quality
of life in the Treasure Valley (by supporting air quality, public
transit funding, and smarter growth), providing statewide safety
standards and criminal background checks for child day care
providers, working for voluntary early childhood education,
and working for family values that value families like access
to affordable, quality health care and pharmaceuticals, a world-class
public education system, livable wages, worker protection, community-based
substance abuse and mental health treatment (rather than costlier
incarceration), clean, sustainable power, a healthy environment,
access to public lands, and policies that improve our everyday
quality of life and empower local communities.
|
| Candidate Statement about The Common Interest: |
| |
As a respected and non-partisan organization, the Common Interest
is ideally positioned to advocate for common-sense solutions to
the issues that we face. The Common Interest can be influential
not only in providing potential solutions to issues but more importantly
to making sure that critical issues are placed on the legislative
agenda. Because of the dominance of one party it is common for
a very limited number of potential solutions to be debated by
the Legislature. It is vitally important that a broad range of
potential solutions are evaluated by the legislature to ensure
that the best possible public policy is enacted. The Common Interest
can assist the legislature in vetting the full range of ideas
and possibilities, and providing information and assistance.
My role as a State Senator is to interact with the Common Interest
to help advance the discussion of issues that are of vital importance.
The issue of increasing beer and wine taxes to provide resources
for substance abuse treatment is a very good example.
I appreciate the thoughtful counsel of the Common Interest
and look forward to working with you in the future. |
| Candidate Bio: |
| |
Senator Elliot Werk was born in Montreal, Canada, immigrated
to the United States when he was seven and became a citizen in
1979. He attended Sonoma State University where he graduated cum
laude with a Bachelor of Science degree in geology and worked
as an engineering geologist and geothermal exploration geologist.
In 1986 he began a career working as an environmental consultant
restoring contaminated properties for companies like General Dynamics
and Shell Oil Company and providing due diligence services to
large real estate investment trust companies.
He is married to Nancy Greenwald (a local physician) and has
one daughter (Hattie) that attends a public high school in Boise.
Senator Werk is deeply involved in his community through the
Borah Neighborhood Association where he serves as president.
In the Idaho legislature Senator Werk currently serves on the
Joint Finance Appropriations, Commerce and Human Resources,
Health and Welfare, Joint Legislative Oversight, and Millennium
Fund committees as well as the Property Tax and Energy, Environment,
and Technology interim committees.
Senator Werk has focused on legislation associated with energy
and energy efficiency, child day care standards, consumer protection,
eliminating the tax on food, mental health and substance abuse,
ethics and transparency in government, and the impacts of climate
change on Idaho’s economy.
|
| Candidate Statement on Partisan Politics
and Special Interests: |
| |
I’m afraid that my thoughts on this subject are mostly negative.
Partisan political (and internecine war between factions of
the Republican Party) and special interests have a mostly negative
influence on public policy. In many instances the overwhelming
dominance of one party in Idaho results in a narrowing of the
legislative agenda and an even narrower list of potential solutions
that are debated. Partisan politics can scuttle promising legislative
initiatives. The influence of special interests in a one party
dominated legislature also severely narrows the agenda and results
in public policy that is often skewed to benefit a very narrow
group at the expense of the majority of individuals in the state.
My job as a legislator is to bridge the gap between parties
and ensure an open exchange of ideas. This allows legislators
to evaluate issues more fully and to evolve to more moderate
and beneficial positions. Partisan politics and the influence
of special interests can be overcome.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|